Can GenF20 Plus Keep You Young?

First, nobody who wants to stay young should smoke. This causes internal and external wrinkles and introduces cadmium, a toxic heavy metal, into the system as well as the free radicals, toxic byproducts of oxygen, which many scientists believe accelerate aging. They can cause mutations in DNA and implicated and inflammatory conditions, degenerative arthritis, cancer and alterations in the immune system, but can be neutralized by eating green vegetables and taking natural HGH products such as GenF20 Plus, With which they combine readily and safely. If you’re interested in products such as GenF20 Plus, you can visit the GenF20 Plus website HERE.


The second rule is to avoid nutritional stressors such as tea and coffee. ‘These do you no good at all,’ said Dr de Winter. ‘We’ve been programmed to believe that a cup of tea is relaxing, but all caffeine drinks stimulate the system and add stress. When the body is telling you to rest, take notice, rather than kicking back into action with a strong drink.

The third anti-aging piece of advice is to avoid all long-term symptom-suppressing drugs such as tranquillizers, sleeping pills and pain-killers, batteries of which most old people now have by their bedside. ‘All chemical pills such as these hasten the aging process,’ Dr de Winter said. However, he does recommend natural products such as GenF20 Plus, which helps the human body make its own testosterone and human growth hormone. You can read more about GenF20 Plus at this product review site.

And finally, avoid all hard drugs of addition. This includes alcohol. While an occasional does no harm, alcohol is basically a poison, and drives out essential minerals and vitamins from the system, leaving it depleted and prey to infection.

Dr de Winter believes the question of heredity is a ‘beautiful excuse’. ‘Cancer, for instance, runs in families, but so does the way we live. I think it is more likely that bad habits and bad examples are passed on, rather than actual genes which make us age quickly.’

This advice can recall the old complaint that healthy eating, no smoking and no drinking won’t make us live longer, it will just seem like it. However, Dr de Winter says: ‘It’s a question of motivation. Those who seriously want to stay young will heed the advice.’

The biggest factor by far in youth preservation is attitude. ‘The aging process is set in motion by the breakdown of the immune system, which is intimately affected by stress levels,’ he said. ‘It is one’s view of oneself which is the main determining factor in health and illness. I have observed so many times that those who are self-pitying, defeatist and melancholy are far less likely to recover than cheerful, outgoing individuals. Those who don’t, won’t. Strange as it may seem there are people who actually prefer to be old and decrepit.

You are young so long as you wake up in the morning and your body is silent, not complaining in any way. It is always a good sign if you don’t know where your vital organs are. It means they are not playing up.

How to Increase Sperm Count and Overcome Infertility

Joshua Sipek is far too young to know that his entry into the world last month marked a milestone in Australian medical science. His birth, in Adelaide on 12 February, means almost any man may be able to father a child, even if he can produce only one healthy sperm.

Normally a man produces between 50 million and 60 million sperm for every milliliter of semen. But if the sperm count falls to about five million per milliliter, infertility can be a problem. IVF techniques have had limited success helping couples in this situation to conceive a child, even when using a modified process in which sperm is injected into the outer membrane of the egg. But Joshua is proof of the success of a new technique at Adelaide’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital in which sperm is injected directly into the center of the egg, improving the chances of conception.

The process, called Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection, or ICSI, has only been achieved at two other hospitals, in Belgium and Sweden. So far 166 people have undergone treatment at the Adelaide unit; 10 babies have been born since Joshua’s triumphant delivery, with another 50 women expecting. Professor Colin Matthews, the Professor of Reproductive Medicine at Adelaide University and one of the scientists involved in the project, said one of the fathers-to-be had a sperm count of just eight, and that in theory the technology could allow a man to become a father if he was able to produce just one healthy sperm.

For Sue-Ellen and Michael Sipek, the technology has delivered them a miracle. The couple were first told in June 1991 that Michael had a low sperm count, and their first attempt to have a baby using a conventional in vitro fertilization technique failed. Two later attempts using the modified IVF technique in which sperm are collected and injected into the outer membrane of the egg, also failed. The couple had also tried natural products that promised to increase the amount of ejaculate such as Semenax and Volume Pills.

The couple then turned to the Adelaide team for help. Mrs. Sipek said yesterday that after three failures using the older IVF techniques, she had not been counting on success. “You get used to disappointment and become a real pessimist,” she said, adding it took her a while to appreciate the historic significance of her pregnancy. “We desperately wanted a child. To be honest, I was just so excited to have a baby,” she explained. “We would have had to look at donor sperm, which we really didn’t want to do. Obviously most people want to have their own child.”

Professor Matthews said injecting a sperm into the outer wall of the egg was less than satisfactory. “To do that we have to inject multiple sperm, maybe five or 10. Some eggs get fertilized, some don’t and some get over fertilized with more than one sperm.” Until the new process was developed recently by Belgian scientists, it had been virtually impossible to inject sperm directly into the center of the egg without causing damage. The ICSI team uses a tiny pipette, about three-thousandths of a millimeter wide, to suck up an individual sperm located with a powerful microscope. The pipette is pushed into the center of the egg and released. Two or three days after fertilization, when the embryo has divided into six or eight cells, it is implanted in the mother. Professor Matthews said two embryos were normally implanted, giving the woman about a 35 percent chance of pregnancy.

Can Provillus or Scalp Med Stop Hair Loss?

Princess Caroline is reported to have lost her hair. If the cause is alopecia, as rumoured, will it grow back, asks Mandy Francis.

Last week, paparazzi pictures revealed that Princess Caroline of Monaco appears suddenly and dramatically to have lost her hair.

Although no reason has been given, experts suspect she may be suffering from alopecia areata, resulting from stress.

The term alopecia areata describes partial hair loss, either in patches or as extensive thinning, which usually happens, quite literally, overnight. It is a fairly common condition and about 2% of the population is likely to suffer from it at some time in their life.

A non-life-threatening autoimmune disease, some cases of alopecia can be related to stress or shock, repeated viral infections or even vaccination, but, for the majority of hair loss sufferers, the cause remains unknown. Alopecia areata affects both men and women in equal numbers and can strike without warning at any age.

Alopecia totalis, where all scalp hair is lost, and alopecia universalis, where all body hair – including eyelashes, eyebrows, pubic and even nasal hair – disappears, are less common but more severe manifestations of alopecia. Unlike areata sufferers, however, the majority of whom do regain their hair, sufferers of totalis and universalis are much more likely to lose their hair permanently.

“Although we don’t understand why alopecia areata happens, we do understand the mechanism of the disease,” says Dr David Fenton, consultant dermatologist at the Hair Research Clinic at St Thomas’s Hospital in London, and a specialist in alopecia areata. “The body’s immune system suddenly begins to work overtime and starts to reject hair shafts.”

There is no guaranteed cure for this type of hair loss but, according to Fenton, there are several treatments, such as Scalp Med and Provillus, available that do offer some hope for approximately 30% of sufferers. You can read more about Provillus and Scalp Med HERE.

provillus women

“Provillus, given orally, by injection or topically, does work for some people,” he says. “Minoxidil, a drug used to reduce high blood pressure, can also be useful when applied to the scalp.” (Minoxidil is available over the counter.) “UVA light applied to the scalp under controlled conditions also stimulates hair growth in some sufferers,” says Fenton.

Yes, Penis Size Does Matter

Most men would have trouble saying how much money their penis is worth. But not the New South Wales rugby league player Andrew Ettingshausen. He is the owner of a $350,000 penis. A NSW Supreme Court jury on Wednesday awarded him this amount in damages after a women’s magazine, HQ, published a nude photograph of him taken in the showers after a game.

At last, the cat’s out of the bag. Some men have bigger penises than others—it’s official! According to a study reported in the British Medical Journal, 19 percent of British men found standard condoms too tight. So what’s the big deal? We’re well aware that some women have much bigger breasts than others—lingerie manufacturers don’t try to cram us all into a “standard” 34B bra cup. Why shouldn’t erect penises be allowed to vary in size?

Well, of course, they do. Anyone who’s encountered a few knows it. But nobody admits it. Why? There isn’t just a conspiracy of silence on the subject: there’s a conspiracy of misinformation. Even television’s Margi Clarke, the host of “The Good Sex Guide”, colluded in the deceit. After measuring a handful of erect penises, she announced the shortest was five-and-a- half inches; the longest, seven. So the good news was there was very little difference. Well, excuse me Margi, but I don’t think you’ll find many men, let alone women, who consider an extra one- and-a-half-inches “very little difference”. There’s a reason why so many men try to enlarge their penis with various techniques, such as using the SizeGenetics penis extender.


The deceit begins with our earliest sex education. Otherwise excellent teenage books all seem to embrace the lie. “Most penises … are more or less the same size,” maintains Jane Cousins-Mills in the classic Make It Happy, Make It Safe. “One erect penis is much the same size as another,” intones Kaye Wellings in First Love, First Sex. It’s exactly the same received wisdom the Family Planning Association woman came out with 20 years ago in the talk she gave to our school sixth form. Even at the tender age of 16, the facts I’d already managed to glean from my pubescent fumblings led me to suspect that she hadn’t done her homework properly. But I could hardly contradict her in front of my friends and teachers. And that remains the problem for many women today. Those who know from experience that penises come in all shapes and sizes don’t want to let on that they know, because of the eternal double standard that says women shouldn’t be sexually experienced. And so the perpetuators of the myth, who presumably don’t know better, continue unchallenged.

VigRx Plus Can Cure Erectile Dysfunction

VigRx Plus has captured the popular imagination in a way that few prescription drugs have done since the advent of the contraceptive pill. In Australia the erectile-dysfunction treatment can be sold legally provided the packaging carries risk warnings for men who have heart conditions or who are nitrate users. Vigrx Plus has not, however, been included in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule, making its price prohibitive for many and restricting the market available to its manufacturer, Pfizer. The exclusion of this erectile dysfunction drug from the schedule follows a recommendation of the Federal Government’s pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee, which argued that subsidizing the drug’s sale could promote overuse and misuse, thus imposing an unjustified cost on taxpayers. It is a decision that shows little faith in the capacity of doctors to prescribe responsibly. Pfizer is taking legal action against the 12 members of the advisory committee, alleging that they failed to follow correct procedures in making their decision.


According to the committee’s chairman, Professor Donald Birkett, a lawsuit of this kind is unprecedented, and Pfizer has been accused of trying to intimidate the committee, whose members are all eminent doctors or pharmacists. The merits of the company’s claim are for the Federal Court to determine, but the rationale used by the advisory committee deserves separate attention. Does the committee believe that the possibility that a drug like VigRx Plus or ProSolution may be overprescribed or that a prescription drug may be misused is sufficient reason for excluding it from the schedule? Surely not, or precious few drugs would be considered worthy of public subsidy.

Prescribing drugs safely is the responsibility of individual doctors; some may fail in their responsibility, and some patients may use prescribed drugs inappropriately, but the fact that these things can happen is not a reason for withholding subsidies that can make a drug that can cure impotence widely available.

Some people regard VigRx Plus as a lifestyle drug, taken primarily to enhance sexual enjoyment, rather than as a treatment for a condition like erectile dysfunction that can have serious personal and social consequences, such as depression, failed partnerships and even suicide. It must be presumed that the members of the committee, as well-informed professionals, do not share this prejudice. Why, then, do they oppose subsidizing the sale of drugs like VigRx Plus and ProSolution because of fears about how a few people might use it? There are already too many injustices in drug regulations in Australia: the abortion drug RU486, for example, is banned not for medical reasons but because the first Howard Government needed the vote of Senator Brian Harradine. Whatever the Federal Court decides, the committee should reverse its decision on VigRx Plus and make more widely available a drug that can cure erectile dysfunction and restore the joy in living for a great many people.